Where we
actually are.
Most companies publish a roadmap. Fewer publish the gaps. If Warden is going to ask a fire service to trust a record it can't see inside, the least we can do is state plainly what is built, what isn't, and what is still wrong. Some of it you can check today, some of it you cannot yet, and some of it is uncomfortable.
Warden's entire proposition is that a record should be verifiable rather than taken on trust. That principle is worthless if the people describing Warden get a free pass. So this page is written to the same standard as the verification page: no green ticks that haven't been earned.
01 At a glance
02 Live system feed
The heartbeat — or the honest silence.
Public cryptographic events only; incident and flight records are not public and never appear here. More about this feed →
03 What is genuinely built
Working code, not slideware. The verifier scripts and the console demo can be inspected; the backend code is not public.
Done The governance layer
Role-based command console, a commander's flight-authorisation entry on the record (one per incident; it records the decision and cannot stop a launch), append-only event ledger with database triggers that reject UPDATE and DELETE, a seal guard that refuses to reopen a closed incident, and a governed purge that writes its own deletion onto the record (its schedule is designed but not yet switched on).
Done Verification anyone can run
Every ledger event is hash-chained with SHA-256, which needs no key, and signed with Ed25519 under key warden-2026-10, whose fingerprint is published on the verification page. Anyone with an export of a record can check every link and signature against that pinned fingerprint without any Warden secret, and each chain is bound to its incident. The old keyed-HMAC secret is deleted. Both verifier scripts are downloadable and readable, and refuse to establish authorship without a pinned fingerprint. Tamper-evident and independently verifiable from an export — no known issues within the reviewed scope. Events up to the latest time-stamped anchor also carry an outside RFC 3161 time-stamp, checkable with openssl; the newest are not covered until the next anchor: see 04.
Done The data-protection groundwork
A pre-reasoned starter DPIA (data protection impact assessment, under Article 35 of the UK General Data Protection Regulation) for the fire service's own data protection officer to complete and own, a proposed lawful basis (public task) that is the service's to decide, a no-facial-recognition red line and a live-only-by-default posture — all published rather than promised.
Built Ingestion that sends no command
Video and telemetry in. Warden's software sends no command to the aircraft: it contains no function that sends anything to it. Two limits: the receive-only set-up of the telemetry tap (a third-party gateway that can send) is not yet built or tested, and the feeds have been tested only against ArduPilot's simulator and a test video stream. No real aircraft has been connected, and there is no DJI or dock integration yet.
04 What is wrong or missing
The list we would rather you heard from us.
05 What happens next, in order
Sequenced by what blocks what — not by what is most fun to build.
Next Exports and hosting
Decide how an export, including the whole-ledger export the anchor check needs, reaches an outside checker, and settle where the backend is hosted.
Then A route in through existing suppliers
UK fire and rescue services typically fly their own drones, bought, trained and supported through suppliers they already work with. So Warden's route to a service is inside an existing supplier's offering, a framework, or a market-engagement notice the fire authority itself publishes, not a direct approach to the service. What that involves →
Then Independent assurance
Cyber Essentials, a penetration test against the deployed system, and professional indemnity cover — the things that let a public body run supplier due diligence without stopping.
Later Procurement readiness
Article 28 processing agreement, a published commercial model, and a place in the supplier offerings and frameworks fire services already buy through.
06 Holding us to this
A status page nobody checks is just marketing with worse formatting.
If something here is out of date, wrong, or reads as more flattering than the evidence supports, tell us and we will correct it. The technical claims are the ones to test first: the algorithm, the signing key's fingerprint and the tooling are published so you can check an export of a record rather than believe this page, and the verification page says what that check does not prove.