VIGIL·DFR OVERWATCH FIRE & RESCUE · COMMAND
Simulation Governed mode --:--:--
Drone as a first responder · command overwatch

Eyes over the incident,
before the first appliance.

When a 999 fire call drops, the drone reaches the scene ahead of the crews and streams thermal overwatch to the incident commander. This is the console they'd command it from — and the governance that lets a Fire & Rescue Service run it lawfully. Software you implement; the drone is any operator's.

Interactive concept demo. Everything here is synthetic — no real incident, no real people, no personal data. It runs entirely in your browser and makes zero external network requests — nothing is collected, transmitted or stored. Run a callout below.

Open the demo full-screen ↗

01 UK security & data protection — built in

The blocker to fire drones isn't the tech. It's a data-protection officer being able to sign it off.

Flying a thermal camera over homes is personal-data processing. So governance isn't a policy PDF bolted on afterwards — it's wired into the console, and every decision is written to the tamper-evident ledger above. This is the posture the product is built to; a live deployment finalises it with the force's DPO under a full DPIA.

Lawful basis

Public task, life-safety

Imagery that may include people is processed under public task (UK GDPR Art 6(1)(e)) — a statutory fire & rescue function; vital interests (Art 6(1)(d)) is the narrow fallback in an acute life threat. Any casualty/health signal is special-category data handled under Art 9(2)(c) with a DPA 2018 Schedule 1 condition. Purpose is strictly firefighting and scene safety.

UK GDPR Art 6 & 9 · Data Protection Act 2018
Hard red line

No facial recognition. Ever.

Overwatch assesses a scene, never identifies a person. No facial-recognition or biometric-matching model is integrated, and the architecture is designed so it cannot be added without a governance change. Bystanders are minimised, not recognised.

Data minimisation · Art 5(1)(c)
DPIA

Assessed before it flies

Systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area requires a Data Protection Impact Assessment (Art 35). A real deployment completes and signs the DPIA with the deploying service before day one.

UK GDPR Art 35 · ICO guidance
Not covert surveillance

Overt, incident-linked only

Overt, incident-linked emergency use generally falls outside the RIPA directed-surveillance regime — covertness is assessed case-by-case. The system is designed for overt, incident-triggered use only; and Article 8 necessity and proportionality apply to every flight regardless.

RIPA 2000 (Part II) · HRA Art 8
Retention & disclosure

Deleted by default

Footage is auto-deleted after a set retention window unless lawfully held as evidence (fire investigation, coroner, litigation). Subject-access, FOI and disclosure are handled with a full access trail.

Storage limitation · Art 5(1)(e)
Surveillance principles

Operated to the principles

Run to established surveillance-camera good-practice principles — now consolidated under ICO oversight following the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 — a clear purpose, proportionate use, published policies, and accountable oversight.

ICO guidance
Secure by design

NCSC-aligned, UK-sovereign

Designed to be encrypted in transit and at rest, with UK data residency and UK-held keys, role-based access, and no third-party data sharing or foreign control plane. Aligned to NCSC secure-by-design principles.

NCSC · UK sovereign
Human rights

Necessary & proportionate

Every deployment is justified against necessity and proportionality (Human Rights Act, Art 8). The named commander's authorisation — and the reason — is recorded before the flight.

Human Rights Act 1998
Accountability

The ledger is the proof

Who authorised it, what was recorded, why, for how long, and who accessed it — all hash-chained and tamper-evident. Answerable to the ICO, the public, and the courts. Try the tamper test above.

Accountability · Art 5(2)

02 What gets implemented

You create the brain and the trust layer. The drone is anyone's.

Vigil provides (software)

  • The commander's operating pictureThermal + EO + incident data as one live decision view, on a tablet in the appliance.
  • The tamper-evident audit ledgerEvery authorise, record, flag and access, hash-chained — the DPO's evidence.
  • The governance engineLawful-basis, retention, no-facial-recognition and surveillance controls built into the software.
  • The post-incident disclosure packSealed record, retention schedule, redaction and disclosure handling.

Off-shelf / partner provides

  • The drone & thermal payloadCertified hardware — bought, not built.
  • The Drone-in-a-Box dockWeatherproof automated hangar on the station roof.
  • The flying & CAA authorisationA licensed BVLOS operator holds the Operational Authorisation.
  • CAD integrationThe 999 dispatch trigger, integrated per force.

Day-one reality: the drone launching before the crew leaves is the destination. The first authorised version is human-supervised and pre-positioned, augmenting a service's existing drone unit. The autonomy dial turns up as the safety case matures — the console and the governance are built for both.